While talking to my friend yesterday on how web design has changed the approach to interaction and communication, he asked me if I could remember how Google used to look like in 1998, and I couldn’t, of course.

Do you remember how some of the most popular websites used to look like?

How web design was before Drupal or Joomla for instance?  How far web and graphic design has come to in the last decades is interesting to analyse, as it is also the best way to see those changes, right?

In 1998, Google was in beta (had an exclamation mark?), however, still very simple in comparison to other major websites.

Even then, Google offered users to choose how many results they want to show in the results, or to get Google updates.The simplicity, as it appears, remained one of the most valuable qualities of the search engine although today different search options got nicely included in the background. Simple on the first look, with more functionalities hidden on the page.


Yahoo! was certainly the king of the content, right? With a list of topics, sections such as What’s cool? or What’s popular?, Yahoo! underwent quite a change, though these sections still exist in a way.


The most obvious change is that it used to be more focused on search queries, while today, it became an informational portal. At least today it has more attractive search bars and buttons (I admit, I was never a fan of Yahoo!) calling out for people to engage in numerous ways.


Amazon in 1995 was all about books, with a very clear message to visitors. Today, it’s one of the most predominant retailers. The design however, wasn’t appealing at all, although one was able to browse the database, read reviews, and see various categories.


Amazon today is simpler and organized, with a very clear message to users as well, though one might forget that message with so many images grabbing their attention. Amazon today is certainly communicating and selling differently.


The first video on YouTube was uploaded on April 23 in 2005 called Me at the Zoo, a 19-second clip, and YouTube has come a long way since then. One may notice that it lacked information, whereas, today, it offers categories, suggestions, lists, and more. As is expected from a video website, today, it tries to give the best experience for users.


We all have an idea how Facebook became a network that it is today, but when it comes to its design, back in 2004, it had no photos, wall, news feed, pages, it was limited only to Harvard students (in march to Stanford, Columbia and Yale), and it reached only 1M users.


However, the sign up page is quite similar in its functionality to the one today. Facebook today is more organized and cleaner in design.

Today Twitter’s newcomers no longer need an explanation on how to tweet. In 2006, when Twitter first went public, it was called Twttr, and the URL for the website was twttr.com. Today, Twitter is simple and attractive.


LinkedIn has probably come the longest way for a network, although it wasn’t so attractive when launched. However, back in 2003, LinkedIn did provide good information in a relatively simple way, informing what you can do on the network and how.


LinkedIn today has a clear message on why anyone should create an account, and it has grown into a platform of business professionals. As for the design, the difference is more than obvious.


In 1998, Wired magazine was text-based, with a weird color combination of red in the background and listing in light green. However, for text-based website it had good organization. Today, Wired is even more organized, appealing and attractive.


After these images, it’s needless to say how web design has changed, (thankfully). However, the difference doesn’t only concern design, we can see changes in communication, interaction, participation and experience online. With design changes, we changed how we engage, work and live online.

Do you remember how the Internet looked like in 1995? Brilliant!


Then,  “successful home pages could be seen by twenty or thirty thousand people a week.”